Also, the risk assessment document helps doctors to ensure the medication processes are running without any risk. This ensures that the opposition, responsible for keeping parliament accountable approves of legislation that is passed ensuring our rights and values are protected and upheld.
Some countries have hybrid systems such as Franceand other systems are possible the executive could be folded fully into the legislature, made a council of several Nurses in the health care context have a sound practise in dealing with operational risks and the needs of vulnerable groups within the health care setting.
A presidential system such as the USA, in which there is an executive who is directly elected, and a parliamentary system such as the UK, in which the legislature is elected and then the legislature chooses the executive.
Preparation of risk assessment is much important and managers take the responsibility of minimising the operational risks by creating risk assessments for patients Swayne et al, That can be seen as a weakness Temkin and Ashworth, With a parliamentary system, there is more coalition-building within the parliament necessary to achieve executive power, mitigating the effects of simply having a majority in favor of a harmful policy.
The Independent Safeguarding Authority was created under the power of this legislation. This ensures that laws passed by parliament are understood, well drafted and accepted by the community. Bills proposed by government in the Lower House will likely pass due to the number of individuals supporting its passage in the Lower House.
In order to be retain their position, members must please the majority of their voters and make decisions they believe will reflect majority values and mirror the mores in society. Parliamentary systems generally avoid partisan gridlock, where one party controls the executive and an opposing party controls the legislature, and neither is willing to do anything because it would mean supporting the opposing agenda.
This occurs when the government in power also holds the majority in the Upper House Senate. This legislation needs to expand and widen the definition of vulnerable parties so a large area of vulnerable groups can have the protection under this legislation Mandelstam, Doctors use diagnosis reports to identify the need of care.
This could be for many reasons, but all other things equal, it does argue in favor of a parliamentary system. The requirements needed for a bill to become law means that it must be public discussed and debated in the arena that is parliament.
This means that if parliament can foresee an issue or problem arising in society, it can be proactive in responding prior to any negative incidents taking place or a situation becoming worse. It is a strength to have methods in reducing the risk factors so elders feel safer, but in the other hand, this type of legislation is not applicable for the small scale of care homes.
This allows parliament to gain feedback, knowledge and opinions from all areas of the community affected by the legislation. As such, they have a duty to represent the views of the people, make laws to meet the needs of society and be held accountable for their reaction.
On the other hand, it avoids the inconvenience of overly frequent elections and allows new elections to be held if a prime minister is incapacitated whereas in a presidential system there usually has to be a vice president or some similar mechanism for automatic succession.
Some parliamentary systems allow the parliament to schedule elections more or less when they please within certain constraintswhereas presidential systems almost always have a well-defined election schedule such as holding an election every four years. Overall it can be seen that clearly, parliament is not a perfect law making structure.
This can allow the ruling party to partially control the election outcome by manipulating the calendar, holding votes only when their poll numbers are favorable. More essays like this: A parliamentary system can be a means of weakening the tyranny of the majority, the possibility that a democratic vote could lead a majority of the population to violate the rights of a minority of the population.
That is an advantage as well as a strength because the authorities have provided many safeguarding as well as emergency services such first aid support as well as transport facilities to care homes.
Key professionals do their job in the health care settings by creating risk assessments and developing the care services with the care home.
Delegated legislation, the ability for parliament to pass on some of their law making powers to subordinate authorities is another area of concern.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates. This legislation ensures respecting individuals, carrying them and minimising the risk factors for them to ensure their safety.
They need more knowledge to apply these types of processes in their place. Despite this flaw, a strength of parliament is that they are democratically elected by their electorate.Evaluate Parliament as a lawmaker Parliament is the supreme law making body consisting of all elected members of both houses.
Evaluate Two Strengths and Weaknesses of Parliament as a Law Maker. Parliament Essay. Evaluate Parliament as a lawmaker Parliament is the supreme law making body consisting of all elected members of both houses.
Its main role is to make laws, laws that not only protect society and individual rights but reflect the societies values. Apr 28, · Hi, i was just wondering whether i could get an idea, as to what the general summarized strengths and weaknesses of Parliament as a law maker are.
Open Document. Below is an essay on "What Are the Strengths and Weaknesses of Parliamentary and Presidential Systems of Government." from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples/5(1). Start studying strengths and weaknesses of parliament as a law-making body.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Strengths Weaknesses Courts must make a decision on cases that come before them, and therefore they can change the law quickly once a relevant case arises. Court must wait for a new case to arise to make law and such cases are rare.
For a case to be bought before the court a party must [ ].Download